边境风云豆瓣开分（Borderline Tensions The Controversial DouBan Rating of Wind River）
Borderline Tensions: The Controversial DouBan Rating of Wind River
Introduction
When it comes to evaluating a film's quality, audience ratings can be an important reference. However, in the case of Wind River, the 2017 crime thriller set in a Native American reservation, the DouBan ratings have stirred up heated discussions and debates. As of July 2021, the film's rating on the popular Chinese online review platform has been fluctuating between 2.5 and 9.3, reflecting a wide divergence of opinions. This article will examine the reasons behind the divisive ratings and explore the cultural and political factors that underline the controversy.
The First Impression: A Thrilling but Flawed Crime Drama
On the surface, Wind River appears to be a typical Hollywood crime thriller, featuring a veteran tracker Cory Lambert (Jeremy Renner) teaming up with a rookie FBI agent Jane Banner (Elizabeth Olsen) to solve the mysterious death of a young Native American woman. The film boasts of intense action scenes, stunning cinematography, and strong performances, particularly Renner's stoic portrayal of a man haunted by his personal tragedy. However, many viewers have criticized the film for its stereotypical portrayal of the Native Americans, who are shown as either passive victims or violent, drunken thugs. Some have also pointed out the lack of authentic representation of the reservation life and culture, and the insensitivity of the white savior trope. As a result, the initial rating on DouBan was rather mixed and hovered around 6.0 to 7.5.
Controversy Exploded: The Political Context and Media Exposure
It was not until 2020 that Wind River became one of the most talked-about films on DouBan, sparking passionate debates and triggering a significant fluctuation of ratings. The sudden surge of attention can be traced back to two major factors. One is the political context of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement, which has prompted a growing awareness of the systemic discrimination and violence against the marginalized communities, including the Native Americans. Many viewers have revisited the film with a critical lens and condemned it as a prime example of cultural appropriation and erasure. The other factor is the notorious fake online reviews that flooded DouBan in support of the Hong Kong police during the 2019 protests, which have undermined the credibility of the platform's rating system. Both factors have triggered more people to review and rate Wind River, and the disparate opinions have resulted in a rating roller coaster. Some users gave it a 1-star rating, calling it a white supremacist fantasy that glorifies vigilante justice and toxic masculinity. Others gave it a 10-star rating, praising it as a powerful expose of the social issues and a tribute to the beauty of nature and human resilience.
Conclusion: The Complexities of Cross-Cultural Communication
The controversy over Wind River's DouBan ratings reflects the complexities of cross-cultural communication in the age of globalization and social media. Films, as cultural products, are not merely for entertainment but also convey social messages and values, which can be interpreted differently in various contexts. In the case of Wind River, its reception in China is influenced by multiple factors, such as the lack of familiarity with the Native American culture, the different political and historical contexts, and the influence of domestic media discourse. The polarized ratings also reveal the diverse and evolving perspectives of the Chinese audience towards social justice and diversity issues, which are increasingly informed by the global discourses of human rights and anti-racism. Ultimately, the debates and discussions generated by the film's ratings demonstrate the importance of critical thinking, empathy, and open dialogue in the pursuit of cultural understanding and respect.
版权声明：本文版权归原作者所有，转载文章仅为传播更多信息之目的，如作者信息标记有误，请第一时间联系我们修改或删除，多谢。